|
Haemodialysis vascular
access catheters have a significantly higher rate of thrombotic
and infectious complications than
grafts or native A/V fistulas 1.
Permanent tunneled
catheters should provide a blood flow of >
300 ml/min to allow for adequate haemodialysis.
Blood flow should not be
measured by roller pump revolution, as this might overestimate
blood flow by up to 33 % in the presence of highly negative
inflow pressure (- 400 mm Hg) 2.
Blood flow depends on
the size of the catheter and its positioning (see algorithm
Placement and Routine Management of Permanent Tunneled
Catheter for details) and obstruction / thrombosis of the
catheter.
In cases of insufficient
blood flow, differentiation between extrinsic and intrinsic
catheter thrombosis should be made. The former may be caused by
central vein thrombus, atrial thrombus or mural thrombus, and
the latter due to intraluminal thrombus, catheter tip thrombus
or fibrin sheath.
Catheter-related sepsis is largely based on
clinical suspicion. Due to the fact, that dialysis patients
frequently present with non-catheter-related infection, it is
important to identify the source of any infection in order to
avoid unnecessary catheter exchanges 3. Kite et al.
used an endoluminal brush, which allows for sampling of the
endoluminal surface of the catheter in situ 4. The
sensitivity and specificity for the diagnosis of
catheter-related sepsis was 95 % and 84 %, respectively.
However, this procedures is considered by some to
be potentially dangerous, due to the
risk of disruption of the biofilm.
Catheter-related
infection might also present only with minor signs such as
insidious onset of low-grade fever, hypothermia,
hypotension, hypoglycaemia, distant abscesses,
endocarditis or by symptoms of lethargy and confusion.
Both types of thrombi
are rare but can interfere with catheter function5.
It is assumed that the
movement of the catheter tip causes damage to the inner wall of
the vessel resulting in formation of a thrombus. In such
instances, three months of anticoagulation should follow the
removal of the catheter 1.
Insufficient blood flow
can also be caused by catheter malposition. This can be
diagnosed by radiology . In these
cases, the catheter should be repositioned or exchanged over a
guidewire, the correct positioning
should be confirmed by X-ray.
In case of reduced
catheter flow or obstruction, fibrinolytic agents like urokinase
and tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) can be injected
into the catheter (locking the
catheter) for 30 minutes in the predialysis period, locking the
catheter for 24 hours between dialysis sessions or by infusion
of the agent for 2-3 hours during the dialysis session.
If the dysfunction of
the catheter cannot be resolved, catheterogram and/or venography
is indicated to identify precisely
the cause of the catheter dysfunction.
Relapsing catheter
dysfunction may indicate a prothrombotic state of the patient
caused by inflammation, latent infection, hyperfibrinogenaemia,
high platelet count or other abnormalities of the coagulation
cascade. The underlying cause must be treated accordingly. Oral
anticoagulation may maintain patency of the catheter in this
situation.
Urokinase lock and
urokinase infusion have been successfully used to reopen a
catheter or to restore catheter flow 6 7
8 9.
Catheters presenting with low flow high pressures may be locked
for 30 minutes with 10,000 units of urokinase (5,000 units per
branch), then, re-aspirated and flushed with saline (see
appendix for protocol).
A second protocol is infusion of 50,000 or 100,000 units of
urokinase for 20-30 minutes through each catheter lumen.
Suhocki et al. described
successful restoration of catheter flow to >
300 ml/min in 74 % of the cases using urokinase
instillation 10.
Catheters with persisting low flow and high resistance despite
short urokinase lock can be infused for 3 hours continuously
with urokinase at 100,000 units per hour (50000 units per
lumen). The catheter should then be flushed with saline and
flow resistance tested.
Twardowski
compared effectiveness of a
urokinase lock to an infusion of urokinase 8. While
the urokinase lock was only partly successful in 21 out of 286
occluded catheters, an infusion of 20-40,000 IU urokinase lead
to a partial restoration of blood flow in 10 out of 25 patients.
Best results were achieved by infusion of 250,000 IU urokinase
over 3 hours during dialysis. If necessary, this procedure was
repeated during the following dialysis session. Full restoration
of catheter flow was achieved at the first attempt in 132 out of
162 catheters with reduced flow.
In cases of persistent dysfunction a catheterogram and/or a
venography is indicated.
Occluded catheters may be reopened by a combination of
mechanical intervention and fibrinolysis based on a continuous
urokinase infusion of 100,000 units per hour during 3 hours.
Urokinase use is not
recommended in all situations, and is no longer prescribable in
the United States due to safety concerns 7.
Recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) is a safe and
very effective fibrinolytic agent to dissolve catheter clots and
re-establish adequate blood flow 11 12
13 14 15. Efficacy of
tPA seems to be superior or at least
equivalent to urokinase in reopening catheters.
One mg of
tPA was seen to be as equally as
effective as 36,000 units of urokinase 7.
tPA
can also be used either as a catheter lock or as a continuous
infusion. Partial catheter obstruction with low flow and high
resistance may be resolved either by a tPA catheter infusion for
a short period of 2-3 hours 16 or by a catheter lock
for a long duration of an interdialysis period of 24-48 hours)
17. In the latter case it seems appropriate to have a
mixture of tPA and heparin as a
locking solution.
Occluded catheters might be reopened by locking each catheter
line with 2mg/2mL of tPA with a
dwell time of 2 hours, leading to a 74 % success rate of
restoring catheter function. If only partial flow recovery
occurs, the procedure may be repeated a second time, increasing
the success rate to 90 % 15.
Little et al. investigated the long-term outcome of catheters
treated with tPA to restore adequate
blood flow 18. They found the clinical benefit and
cost-effectiveness of treating recurrent catheter malfunction
with tPA to be limited, since this only allowed for a median of
five to seven additional dialysis sessions.
When catheter treatment is unsuccessful (relapsing dysfunction
or persistent occlusion) catheter imaging (catheterogram and
venography) is indicated.
In cases of partial catheter thrombosis or fibrin sheath
formation around the catheter tip, a prolonged thrombolysis of
the catheter may be attempted (see urokinase
*6
or tPA
*7).
A fibrin sheath (also
called fibrin sleeve) surrounding the catheter tip requires the
prolonged infusion of fibrinolytic agent to dissolve the clot.
However, this sheath may not only consist of fibrin alone, but
also of a tissue, formed by the migration of small muscle cells
into the fibrin layer.
If thrombolysis is not
successful in catheters with fibrin sheaths, fibrin sheath
stripping by means of a snare catheter, led up from the
femoral vein, may be indicated. This procedure has a success
rate of 79 % 19 20. However, this
procedure does not provide a durable benefit, as blood flow
rates decreased by the 5th session 21. No
significant difference has been found between fibrin sheath
stripping and urokinase infusion 22.
Suhocki et al. increased
mean catheter survival to 12.7 months by using thrombolysis and
percutaneous mechanical techniques 10.
Persisting dysfunction requires the replacement of the catheter.
Depending on the type of catheter, exchange may be performed
over a guidewire 23.
However, when a fibrin
sheath is the cause of reduced blood flow, this sheath may recur
around the new catheter also 1. In addition,
infectious complications may be better prevented by insertion of
a new catheter at a new venous site. Therefore, new catheter
insertion is preferred by some experts to exchange over a
guidewire.
Catheter brushing is a
new therapeutic option to re-open the catheter 24.
Beleed et al. temporarily restored blood flow in 3 out of 13
patients 25. The main advantage is to save time for
both patient and care providers 26. However, the use
of such a mechanical device is associated with potentially
serious hazards that may be underestimated. These include clot
embolism with potential lung injury, bacteraemia, trauma of the
host vein, perforation of the superior vena cava, right atrium
or the ventricle, arrhythmia, or rupture of the catheter.
Catheter brushing must, therefore, be carefully performed only
by trained physicians under strict fluoroscopy control.
Catheter exit site
should be examined for signs of infection at each haemodialysis
session.
|