|
• Medical
history and concomitant diseases have a strong impact on the choice of
possible access sites. Vascular access as a matter of principle should
be created as distally as possible in order to preserve proximal sites
for later.
• Female
gender and old age as risk factors influencing fistula creation remain
controversial. Elderly and diabetic patients have reduced quality
of vessels needed for successful access creation 1. In diabetic
patients, some authors therefore recommend elbow A/V fistulas instead
of wrist fistulas 2 3. This policy is reasonable in patients
with reduced life expectancy irrespective of underlying diagnosis, in
whom a single successful access procedure may suffice for the rest of
their lives. In younger patients with reasonable life expectancy but
with sub-optimal veins and arteries, however, every effort should be
made to create a peripheral A/V fistula at the wrist or at the forearm,
accepting the increased risk of surgical revision or radiological intervention later.
• Diabetic
patients often display medial calcification of their peripheral arteries
(especially radial and ulnar arteries). Medial calcification will hinder
the maturation process of the A/V fistula by preventing the natural dilatation
of the feeding artery and the subsequent increase in arterial flow. Preoperative
X-ray of the hand can be performed to look for medial sclerosis. When
severe medial sclerosis is present some surgeons avoid radiocephalic
A/V fistula creation in favour of an elbow A/V fistula 4.
However, functional distal A/V fistulas have been reported in the presence
of calcification although there is a higher risk of failure5.
The decision of access site has to be made by an experienced access
surgeon on an individual basis in each diabetic patient.
• Access
surgery is also difficult in small women, children, elderly or obese
patients, in patients with breast and oto-rhino-laryngeal cancers, after
solid organ transplantation and long-term steroid therapy, due to size,
location and damage of vessels. Venography and ultrasonography are of
great value in localising suitable veins in such patients 6.
• Cardiac
surgery, or clavicular fracture increases the risk for central venous
stenosis or occlusion.
• Venous
system cannulation, i.v. drug abuse , intensive intravenous therapy
and numerous venous blood sampling often destroy the superficial venous
system and in such patients, radiological and ultrasonographic examination
has to be done carefully to find a suitable vein for access creation.
• Central
venous catheterisation for dialysis, placement of a pacemaker 7 or port
for chemotherapy, may cause central venous stenosis or thrombosis, often
indicated by clinically obvious venous collateralisation over the shoulder
and chest. Thus, creation of an A/V fistula in the upper limb may be
impaired, since venous stenosis will become symptomatic once
there is increased venous blood flow from the fistula. This condition
usually results in a painful swelling of the whole arm 8.
• Myocardial
infarction, coronary artery bypass grafts, peripheral bypass, stroke
or amputation suggest generalised arterial disease. Thus careful clinical,
ultrasonographic, and angiographic investigation is mandatory,
particularly to assess the quality of the arterial tree 6 9 10.
• As
stated by Sidawy et al.. “contrast arteriography remains the gold standard
for the evaluation of a suspected inflow stenosis or occlusion. When
in doubt regarding the adequacy of the donor artery or the runoff, it
is advisable to obtain an arteriogram that shows the entire arterial
system from the origin of the subclavian to the distal branches. Magnetic
resonance angiography can also be used for the same purpose” 11.
• Hemiparesis
is thought to cause reduced arterial and venous blood flow rates due
to immobility. In most of these patients, the paralysed arm is selected
for access creation despite comparatively less suitable vessels in the
other upper limb, because the other arm may be used to support walking
with crutches and thus the access vein might be exposed to external compression
and damage.
• In
addition, in selecting the paralysed arm, the healthy arm can be used
during the period of haemodialysis, and particularly for puncture
site compression after completion of dialysis.
• In
a severely disabled limb, however, access creation and cannulation may
be difficult or even impossible if severe contracture occurs.
• Patients
suffering from severe joint disease and vasculitis have often undergone
long-term steroid therapy, which often results in vascular complications
such as increased arterial wall thickness, arterial stiffness and loss
of distensibility. Steroid-induced skin atrophy and immunosuppression
enhance the risk for postoperative infectious complications.
• Vascular
access should be placed only after resolution of local or systemic infection.
• Inadequate
venous drainage may be indicated by swelling of one arm compared to the
other, and prominent collateral veins around the shoulder. Such signs
are indications for venography. If the underlying anatomic defect cannot
be corrected, the limb must not be used for access creation, as an already
symptomatic stenosis will become even more so 8.
• In
cases of bilateral obstruction, the central venous stenosis or occlusion
may be treated by angioplasty or surgical bypass, which should be performed
simultaneously to or soon after creation of the A/V fistula. Long-term
success is poor.
• Special
attention has to be paid to venous collaterals of the upper arm and shoulder
suggesting central venous stenosis.
• The
finding of venous collaterals is an indication for bilateral imaging
by MRA or venography, using CO2 or gadolinium in cases of
iodine sensitivity.
• Depending
on the character of the venous narrowing, an A/V fistula can, nevertheless,
be created in some of these patients. With a functioning A/V fistula,
interventional procedures such as angioplasty and/or stent insertion
can be done much more proficiently and successfully. In some of these
patients venous hypertension after creation of the A/V access will be
so mild that a "wait and see“ policy may be instituted. Such decisions
should be based on the investigator’s experience and tailored to the
individual patient.
• Scars
in the arm or neck will reveal previous operations, traumatic events
and central venous catheterisations. A combination of typical scars and
inflammatory signs may be found in a drug addict.
• In
most patients with generalised dermatological problems, a vascular access
can be created using supportive anti-inflammatory therapy recommended
by dermatologists.
• Obesity
can prevent effective palpation of the forearm and upper arm veins. On
the other hand, an absent subcutaneous fatty layer may increase
the risk of skin necrosis, especially when the insertion of graft material
is necessary .
• Subcutaneous
fat usually preserves superficial veins from venipuncture and cannulation.
These veins are often of very good quality but frequently will necessitate
transposition into a more superficial location after fistula creation.
• Examination
should take place in a warm room. A tourniquet should be placed
around the upper arm or a blood pressure cuff inflated to 40 mm Hg in order
to produce sufficient venous distension. For examination of the proximal
upper arm veins a band tourniquet close to the axilla can be used.
The anatomical course of the forearm cephalic and basilic veins should
then be inspected and palpated. The veins should be distensible (up to
2-3 mm), patent and without stenosis up to the elbow in order to provide
a good A/V fistula. By light percussion of the vein at the wrist, a transmitted
pulse wave should be felt in the vein at the elbow and vice versa, proving
the patency of the vein.
• In
addition to the forearm veins, the great veins of the upper arm should
be evaluated carefully. By exerting different pressures with a blood
pressure cuff, diameter, continuity, distensibility and compressibility
of the veins are controlled. In venous thrombosis, these characteristic
clinical signs are usually absent.
• Venous
imaging by either colour-coded duplex-ultrasound, venography or MRI is
indicated when no vein clinically appears to be usable in both forearms.
Venography or MRI should be performed, when a central venous obstruction
is suspected (see *8 and *9 )
• Palpation
characterises the pulses of the brachial, radial and ulnar artery, giving
initial information on the quality of the arterial tree. The pulse of
the brachial artery is palpated at the medial side of the elbow, the
radial pulse 2 cm proximal of the proc. stylodius radii and the ulnar
pulse 2 cm proximal of the proc. styloidius ulnae, to check for any obvious
signs of calcification and atherosclerosis impairing the arterial inflow.
The pulses are graded as “normal”, “diminished” and “absent” 11 and
compared with the contralateral limb.
• The
Allen test is a very subjective assessment of distal hand circulation
with variable outcome. Its value in the assessment for A/V fistula placement
remains controversial and of limited value (see appendix for details).
• Systolic
and diastolic blood pressures should be measured in both arms according
to the Riva-Rocci method, in the supine position. An index of the systolic
blood pressure of the ipsilateral arm with the systolic blood pressure
of the contralateral arm is calculated:
|
AAI
(arm/arm index) = |
systolic
blood pressure projected fistula arm systolic
blood pressure contralateral arm |
• Significant
proximal arterial disease is likely with an AAI < 0.90. There should
be a blood pressure difference of less than 20 mm Hg in the upper limb
selected for A/V fistula creation, compared to the contralateral limb.
For creating an A/V fistula, a difference in blood pressure below 20
mm Hg is chosen as an non invasive criterion for the selection of upper
extremity arterias 12.
• In
presence of an arterial stenosis, auscultation along the axillary and
subclavian artery can reveal a high-frequency bruit.
More
detailed information on the quality of the arterial system is provided
by duplex scanning 6, which is highly recommended and is evidence
based.
|